ETFs and passive investing
The underestimated risks of ETFs and passive investing
December 16, 2019 | ETFs
Low costs for below-average performance
The most powerful argument for ETFs is their low fees. As this form of investment merely replicates an existing index, it does not require a fund manager to invest selectively in individual equities or other securities. This saves the cost of its work.
In addition, ETFs also allow smaller investors to invest in a wide range of equities at a stroke. This means, as the saying goes, that the investor does not have to “put all his eggs in one basket” and diversifies his portfolio.
In principle, ETFs are a plausible way of investing as cheaply as possible in different companies and markets in order to achieve market-conform (i.e. average) performance. On average means nothing bad per se – in a good stock market year, solid returns are possible. But since ETFs merely track other indices, they will never perform better than these – if fees are included, performance even falls below average.
Since no fund manager actively pulls the strings in the background, but also in this scenario the corresponding index is still rigidly represented due to the business model, no loss limitation takes place in ETFs.
ETFs damage the economy as a whole
The passivity of ETFs also creates an unpleasant side effect that could harm the economy in the long term.
ETFs are in fact shareholders of the companies in which they invest. Of course, this also means that they have voting rights at the annual general meetings of these companies. These events are an important vehicle for public companies to vote on issues such as executive compensation, bonus packages, or improvements in corporate governance.One study found that ETFs are similarly passive in exercising their voting rights as they are in their investments, and in the vast majority of cases approve of corporate governance. Why would they want to make a big difference? By simply tracking an index, and not having to outperform it, ETFs lack the incentive to pay attention to how companies are performing.
Considering that more stocks are now held by passive funds than active funds, this passivity could negatively impact relevant companies in the long run. And while far from every active fund manager makes direct use of their voting rights, they do so on a daily basis by another means – by letting companies know how they rate them through buying and selling.
The underestimated danger of ETFs
We don’t want to badmouth ETFs. For many investors, this form of investment can make sense. However, it is important to note that there are a number of companies in an index that are not doing very well. Either they are companies that are hardly growing any more and are completely overvalued (due to the steady passive acquisitions of ETFs), or perhaps even companies that are already out of money and will be in a very bad position in the near future.
As long as investors blindly buy everything with ETFs, these companies will continue to be “supported” in their valuations. Particularly in the extreme times of ultra-easy monetary policy, this will encourage this situation to inflate – until a major setback occurs and investors withdraw their money all at once.
Healthy companies that are growing and earning a lot of money are being dragged into the depths. But as soon as the situation calms down, the active managers see their chance to get extremely cheap access to the good companies. The overpriced or ailing companies (which are now at best normally priced) are not bought – except by the ETFs. To find out how this can turn out for an ETF buyer, read the short article “Good is not good enough for us“.
We want to be better than the average
We are convinced that with our strategy of value investing, we can achieve above-average returns over the long term and thus outperform comparable indices. This is precisely where our portfolio managers are world-class – in the careful selection of undervalued and strong companies. They prove this year after year.
Outstanding companies at a discount price
The basic principle of value investing is simple: we buy shares in companies whose current or expected price is lower than their value. According to Warren Buffet’s motto, “Price is what you pay. The value is what you get.” In the long term, we assume that the price (= share price) will adjust to the actual value of the company, and the share price will increase (details about our value investing strategy can be found here).
Due to the low minimum investment amount of € 35,000, we enable for the first time also relatively smaller investors to benefit from our sustainably successful investment strategy.
What’s important to you?
Ultimately, you have the choice. If you are satisfied with an average return, ETFs with their low fees are a legitimate option. Or you can rely on the skills of our portfolio managers, who use our proven value investing strategy to achieve above-average performance through selective stock selection. Fees have also fallen sharply as a result of modern technology. For just 1.20% fixed fees plus 10% performance fee of the earned performance, you not only receive excellent asset management but also your own custody account including all costs.
How do you decide?
Estably is the first digital asset management company from Liechtenstein to offer first-class wealth management from € 20,000 through a mix of technology and human investment expertise. Thanks to the portfolio managers' many years of experience in the field of value investing, above-average returns are targeted. This is intended to make professional asset management, previously available exclusively to large investors, accessible to everyone - conveniently, transparently, and profitably.
Did you like the article? Share it!
You might still like these posts
Finance Blog
Good is not good enough for us
Wouldn’t you lose your belief in success if, after five years of negative performance, you were told that things would get better?
Is now the right time to invest?
Catch the perfect moment and beat the market – the supposed dream of every investor. In practice, however, this rarely succeeds, because: nobody can look into the future and predict when exactly the markets will rise or fall again.
The underestimated danger of financial repression
In troubled times, investors are looking for security for their assets. But what does “security” mean?
